Rendered at 14:25:58 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
skholinn 4 days ago [-]
We’re building a robotics system that recovers reusable electronic components from retired hardware. To run experiments we’re looking to buy electronics that are *retired or obsolete but still contain valuable components*.
We’re especially interested in hardware that *is no longer useful as a system but still has valuable chips or components on the boards*.
Typical pricing depends on the hardware, but we often pay *$20–$200+ per unit* for things like servers, networking gear, or laptops depending on what’s inside. Happy to buy bulk lots.
Based in the Bay Area; we can arrange pickup locally or pallet shipping within the US.
If you run ITAD, recycling, refurbishment, repair, or have retired hardware sitting around, email:
sava@dayworkx.com
Even rough descriptions like “a pallet of old switches” are helpful.
girvo 15 hours ago [-]
This is very very cool :)
And is _way_ better than when I'm forced to do this by hand, I'll say that much haha
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
thanks! how often do you have to do it by hand and how long does it take it?
Joel_Mckay 15 hours ago [-]
There are e-waste companies with inert hot-air centrifuges. Essentially, they extract the RoHS solder, clean it, and resell re-certified product back to manufacturers.
The chips simply drop off into a bin, and no ethical company will sell customers used silicon. There were a few folks that ended up getting a few years in prison for that con (small China groups would sand and laser mark old chips with modern lot codes), and hence why many US recycling plants shred the chips for recovery of precious metals.
It is a serious safety problem, and having personally been stung by locally sold counterfeit/used stuff with BS compliance documentation... it sometimes means months of lost project time figuring out what happened. Always direct sample from the manufacturers whenever possible. =3
femto 14 hours ago [-]
I can't see a problem, as long as the chips are not fraudulently resold. Beyond not using a resource in the first place, reuse is the gold standard in sustainability.
As an engineer, I wouldn't use second hand components for prototyping. When prototyping you need to eliminate as much uncertainty as possible. I'd consider using second hand components in production, provided there is a cost advantage, supply is reliable and my production line includes a test that would pick up faulty components. Even then, I'd be monitoring failure rates and reverting to new components if elevated failure rates caused costs. There's an argument that (well handled) second hand components might even have a lower failure rate than new as they have been burned in.
I'm guessing this company is targeting specialsied repair rather than production. Sometimes complex parts are no longer manufactured and the only option is second hand (often at a premium price).
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
the way we see it is that with robotics and coding agents we can offer much comprehensive and traceable tests. anyone can send any hardware they have, we help understand what is reusable, how to verify it and ship the parts back.
curious—what specific failure modes or uncertainties would you want eliminated before you'd consider using recovered parts, even just in production?
Joel_Mckay 13 hours ago [-]
>I can't see a problem, as long as the chips are not fraudulently resold.
In general, most components are only rated for 2 to 4 re-flow heating cycles before internal damage occurs. On some components the initial re-flow cycle brings the component into the rated tolerance, and for others the PCB forms a bimorph cantilever that physically fatigues the chip contacts/leads.
Production yields are only part of the Infant Mortality Phase of the bathtub curve.
Some components do get more stable with age if and only if left alone, but you can count those on one hand if you still have all your fingers. That is also a 3 hour pedantic conversation no one wants to have.
I am secretly a sentient turnip... =3
femto 6 hours ago [-]
That's a fair point: that heating due to repeated (de)soldering can cause degradation.
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
We want to get the data on that. The more boards we process the better we know the failure rates. Do you have an intuition of what exactly degrades?
phyzome 13 hours ago [-]
...OK, I'll bite, what's the "sentient turnip" bit about?
natpalmer1776 10 hours ago [-]
As a member of the genetic tree, I’ll go out on a limb and suggest Autism. It seems a lot like Autism.
Joel_Mckay 10 hours ago [-]
Not really, and most autistic people I've met are very focused individuals. Met one guy whose whole world was the Unreal engine source, and unless you were talking about that specific area... could care less who you were.
Be kind to yourself first, and maybe get outside for a walk. Best regards =3
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
thats guy sounds very interesting, Unreal engine is fun
Joel_Mckay 12 hours ago [-]
Biting is considered bad manners... and don't worry about it. =3
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
exactly!! we aim to have comprehensive and transparent protocols of testing after the extraction which is exactly what is hard without general purpose robotics. if you have any pointers on how to make that happed or any pain points from your experience please send me a note to sava@dayworkx.com !
userbinator 10 hours ago [-]
China has been doing this sort of recycling for literally decades, at a massive scale.
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
that's true, but we've only seen either highly specialized hardware that forces you to lock in or a methods (tumbling / rotary shredding) that destroy the components. we want to leverage general purpose policies more to make the cost of setting up "hardware reuse" nodes less and thus the whole supply chain more distributed and robust.
yellow_lead 8 hours ago [-]
Have any more information or sources? Would like to learn more
6 hours ago [-]
skholinn 3 hours ago [-]
thank you for all the support so far! We've got a lot of inbound and started processing it. there are a lot of interesting questions on this thread and i'll address them soon.
jollymonATX 8 hours ago [-]
So I send in massive 60 drive jbod pcbs and you pay me more than 55c/lb? That's current clean pcb rate at any recycler. Boards are ~8lbs ea. Usually just tossing them unstripped to a muncher that pays 35c/lb for the whole 55lb jbod works out way better for time labor.
jarbus 13 hours ago [-]
This is really cool. In the demo, how do they just yank the chip off the board? I'd have assumed it would be somehow soldered on or something.
techwolf 8 hours ago [-]
Looks like a hot-air rework setup. I've swapped chips by hand that way, once the solder is molten they'll fall right off the board. The hard part is lifting them away without accidentally dislodging anything else.
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
exactly, + we preheat the board before to let the trapped air out. would love to hear more about your experience doing this by hand and where you see automations for this applicable
geoffschmidt 13 hours ago [-]
At 0:16 it looks like they're heating the board from below?
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
thats right! thats to let the trapped air out and preheat before a manipulator heats the target up further and unsolders it.
AndreasKromann 4 days ago [-]
Awesome concept !
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
thanks! do you have any ICs to send over?:)
nikhilyadala 4 days ago [-]
Is it only in the USA?
skholinn 4 days ago [-]
USA and UK!
blitzar 3 hours ago [-]
Can I just post you stuff in the UK?
skholinn 2 hours ago [-]
Totally! please follow up with me on sava@dayworkx.com
Examples:
* servers, networking gear, routers, switches * laptops / workstations * telecom / industrial / embedded boards * lab equipment electronics * obsolete or end-of-life hardware with populated PCBs
We’re especially interested in hardware that *is no longer useful as a system but still has valuable chips or components on the boards*.
Typical pricing depends on the hardware, but we often pay *$20–$200+ per unit* for things like servers, networking gear, or laptops depending on what’s inside. Happy to buy bulk lots.
Based in the Bay Area; we can arrange pickup locally or pallet shipping within the US.
If you run ITAD, recycling, refurbishment, repair, or have retired hardware sitting around, email:
sava@dayworkx.com
Even rough descriptions like “a pallet of old switches” are helpful.
And is _way_ better than when I'm forced to do this by hand, I'll say that much haha
The chips simply drop off into a bin, and no ethical company will sell customers used silicon. There were a few folks that ended up getting a few years in prison for that con (small China groups would sand and laser mark old chips with modern lot codes), and hence why many US recycling plants shred the chips for recovery of precious metals.
It is a serious safety problem, and having personally been stung by locally sold counterfeit/used stuff with BS compliance documentation... it sometimes means months of lost project time figuring out what happened. Always direct sample from the manufacturers whenever possible. =3
As an engineer, I wouldn't use second hand components for prototyping. When prototyping you need to eliminate as much uncertainty as possible. I'd consider using second hand components in production, provided there is a cost advantage, supply is reliable and my production line includes a test that would pick up faulty components. Even then, I'd be monitoring failure rates and reverting to new components if elevated failure rates caused costs. There's an argument that (well handled) second hand components might even have a lower failure rate than new as they have been burned in.
I'm guessing this company is targeting specialsied repair rather than production. Sometimes complex parts are no longer manufactured and the only option is second hand (often at a premium price).
curious—what specific failure modes or uncertainties would you want eliminated before you'd consider using recovered parts, even just in production?
In general, most components are only rated for 2 to 4 re-flow heating cycles before internal damage occurs. On some components the initial re-flow cycle brings the component into the rated tolerance, and for others the PCB forms a bimorph cantilever that physically fatigues the chip contacts/leads.
Production yields are only part of the Infant Mortality Phase of the bathtub curve.
Some components do get more stable with age if and only if left alone, but you can count those on one hand if you still have all your fingers. That is also a 3 hour pedantic conversation no one wants to have.
I am secretly a sentient turnip... =3
Be kind to yourself first, and maybe get outside for a walk. Best regards =3